Kate Hudson’s washboard chest always brought relief to commoners, like myself, and women identified with her un-Pamila-like natural ways. Hence, there are those who are disappointed by Kate’s breast augmentation for personal reasons…
Bonnie Fuller called out and accused Kate’s enhancement as a cure for her solace from ARod’s breakup on HoffPost. She also said something to the effect of K’s insecurities running wild… As if K would waste her time withering away because of ARod? She’s a man eater who never looks back. I sense two faux pas from Bonnie: compensating for her hidden anger and ungodly views about liberation of women.
Can we be as presumptuous as Mr. Fuller and ‘assume’ that more than a decade ago she woke up to a swollen bee sting of a lip injection after getting jilted by a guy? Can we also assume that this remains an unresolved personal issue of hers, thus reflecting it on Kate and other women with a beating? It’s funny how some folks blame and prick the world for their personal humiliations.
Then there is Bonnie’s undertone in disguise about women’s liberation. Her definition charters on fantasies of liberators who burn their bras and crush men with their tiny fists. Any women who resort to vanity and beauty is degrading the birth of Mr. Woman, thus hindering our full-potentials that’s been deprived for centuries.
However, this is one-sided and irrational concept of what women’s liberation should be. Women’s empowerment comes in many shapes and forms. And our ultimate power should stem from making a wise and personal decisions whether others accept it or not. It’s unfair to categorize women with unshaven legs as the only warranted liberators. We shall respect our sisterhoods’ choices to look and feel a certain way as long as it embodies and encompasses self-respect and dignity as a whole.
So given the subject, it’s appropriate to conclude that if your love life hinges on girl-slapping on others for self-therapy, then that’s a wrong form of liberation.